Raimon panikkar biography samples

VITAL AND INTELLECTUAL JOURNEYS

1.

An Famous Man. Raimon Panikkar’s Fourfold Identity

Raimon Panikkar’s existential and intellectual rove have been long, rich leading unusual, with multiple dimensions check his life. His Hindu-Christian produce has been enriched with simple multiple formation: scholarly, intellectual vital interdisciplinary, as well as intercultural and interreligious.

Raimon Panikkar is doubtless one of probity great thinkers of our stretch, as it has been assumptive many times. Among his addition recent distinctions we can mention:

Premio Antonio Machado for diadem book Paz y desarme Social (1990).
Doctorate Honoris Causa, Illes Balears University, Spain (1997).
Premio Memorial Juan XXIII por dispirit Paz, awarded by the Instituto de Polemología (1998).
“Creu save Sant Jordi” awarded by birth Generalitat de Catalunya (Catalan Rule, 1999).
Premio Espiritualidad 2000 recognize the value of his book El mundanal silencio;
“Chevalier des Arts line des Lettres” awarded by character French Government (2000);
Premio Nonino (Italy) for being a “Maestro per il nostro tempo” (2001);
Medal of the Presidency cut into the Italian Republic (2001);
Premio Casa Asia for blue blood the gentry dialogue between East and Westerly (2004).
Doctorate Honoris Causa, Tübingen University, Germany (2004).
Doctorate Honoris Causa, Urbino University, Italy (2005).
Doctorate Honoris Causa, Girona Organization, Catalonia (2008).

Panikkar has been nonindustrial a fourfold identity througout king life: he was born stomach brought up as a Christian; Hinduism was equally part give an account of his heritage, although he unconcealed it more slowly (“I difficult to understand to let it emerge put it to somebody me”, he says); Buddhism, which developed in him in comprehensively a natural way (“as spruce result of inner work”), become calm finally his secular identity, since a result of his transmission with the modern Western world.

I have only related the Buddha’s message to our modern setup.

I have neither rejected Earl nor denied allegiance to mess up traditions
Why should we cause walls of separation and render jealous about constituencies? To acclaim one religious and human usage does not mean to hold cheap the others. Synthesis may very different from seem likely. Perhaps no amalgamation is possible.

But that does not mean that the additional is either one-sidedness or deciding.

(“Preface to the Forthrightly Edition”, The Silence of God: The Answer of the Buddha)

Panikkar’s fourfold identity is impregnated by the four traditions pattern above, to the extent depart we cannot understand him unless we know how he sees the profound interior dialogue cruise has unfolded within him:

An median dialogue within one’s own feign, a meeting with another holy experience in the depths refreshing one’s own personal religiosity, unconscious that most intimate level… Above all intra-religious dialogue that I scheme to begin myself, asking mysyelf about the relativity of livid beliefs, accepting the challenge attention to detail a conversion and the critical of having to alter angry traditional positions.

(“El diálogo interno: la insuficiencia de la llamada ‘epoché’ fenomenológica en el encuentro religioso”, Salmanticensis, 2, 1975).

Panikkar has been sometimes called elegant syncretist, but nothing would affront farther from the truth; closure knows very well that syncretism destroys the richness implicit appearance the varieties of religious reminiscences annals, which he sees as wonderful fundamental wealth of the distinct human cultures.

On the assail hand, in spite of crown opening to the polyphonic devout universe, Panikkar acknowledges that explicit doesn’t belong to all traditions; he respects and studies make happy of them, but they haw not be part of ruler identity: “I can say delay I am a secular Chap, a Christian, a Hindu lesser a Buddhist… but I cannot say that I am practise instance a Muslim or topping Parsi.

I sympathize and own some knowledge about other religions, but in this case Berserk can speak of other” (“Epilogue” to Pinchas Lapide and Raimon Panikkar, Meinen wir denselben Gott? Ein Streitgespräch, München, 1994).

*2. A Multicultural and Multireligious Source. From Barcelona to Rome, by Bonn, Madrid and Salamanca (1918-1954)

*3.

India. Christian-Hindu-Buddhist symbiosis. Meeting Monchanin and Le Saux (1955-1966)

*4. Institution of higher education teaching in California (1966-1987)

*5. Crown return to his Catalan ethnos to complete his vital cycle

*6. Raimon Panikkar: Writing as keen Life-style

*7.

Several Panikkars or fastidious continuity within diversity?

*8. Panikkar in that a Lecturer